Which resume format should you use?
There are three standard resume formats. For the vast majority of people the answer is simple — reverse-chronological — but here's when each makes sense and why the others are riskier.
Build a reverse-chronological resume →
1. Reverse-chronological (recommended for most)
Lists your work history newest-first, with a skills section. It's what recruiters and applicant tracking systems expect, so it parses cleanly and reads fast.
Use it if: you have a steady work history in (or moving toward) the same field — i.e. almost everyone. This is the safe default.
2. Functional (skills-based)
Groups your experience by skill rather than by job, downplaying dates. The problem: recruiters distrust it (it's associated with hiding gaps), and ATS parsers often mis-read it.
Use it rarely: only if dates would genuinely mislead — and even then, a combination format is usually better.
3. Combination (hybrid)
A short skills/summary section up top, followed by a normal reverse-chronological history. Good middle ground for career changers or people with very relevant skills to surface early.
Use it if: you're changing careers or have standout skills you want a recruiter to see in the first five seconds — while still showing a clear timeline.
The bottom line
- Default to reverse-chronological — it's expected, ATS-safe, and easiest to skim.
- Use combination if you're pivoting careers.
- Avoid pure functional unless you have a specific reason — it raises flags.
- Whatever you pick: single column, standard headings, real text (see ATS tips).
The free
resume builder produces a clean reverse-chronological resume (the safe default) with a skills section and a one-click PDF — no formatting fiddling required.